Prepare the Way of the LORD

Sunday, November 29, 2009

A Scripture passage
on this first Sunday of Advent:

A voice cries out:
'In the wilderness
prepare the way of the LORD,
make straight in the desert
a highway for our God.
Every valley shall be lifted up,
and every mountain and hill be made low;
the uneven ground shall become level,
and the rough places a plain.

Then the glory of the LORD shall be revealed,
and all the people shall see it together,
for the mouth of the LORD has spoken.'

- Isaiah 40:3-5 (NRSV)

Labels: ,

Give thanks to the Lord

Thursday, November 26, 2009


O give thanks to the Lord, 
for he is good;
for his steadfast love endures forever.
Let the redeemed of the Lord say so,
those he redeemed from trouble
and gathered in from the lands,
from the east and from the west,
from the north and from the south.

Some wandered in desert wastes,
finding no way to an inhabited town;
hungry and thirsty,
their soul fainted within them.
Then they cried to the Lord 
in their trouble,
and he delivered them 
from their distress;
he led them by a straight way,
until they reached an inhabited town.
Let them thank the Lord for his steadfast love,
for his wonderful works to humankind.
For he satisfies the thirsty,
and the hungry he fills with good things.

Let those who are wise give heed to these things,
and consider the steadfast love of the Lord.

- Psalm 107:1-9, 43 (NRSV)

-------------------------------------------

"Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you. Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise the words of prophets, but test everything; hold fast to what is good; abstain from every form of evil.

"May the God of peace himself sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. The one who calls you is faithful, and he will do this."

- 1 Thessalonians 5:16-22 (NRSV)

Labels: ,

Esther's Choice

Wednesday, December 05, 2007


[The following commentary is intended as a companion piece to my latest article in the Covenant Discipleship Quarterly, which is available here.]

The OT Book of Esther has always fascinated me. For one, it has no direct mention of God anywhere in the text. The closest it ever comes to mentioning God is Mordecai's cryptic statement that, should Esther fail to act on the Jews' behalf, "deliverance will come to the Jews from another quarter."

Beyond that odd fact, Esther is also interesting in the portrayal it gives of the Jews living in exile. So many peoples in history (including the Israelites of the Northern Kingdom) have disappeared from history after suffering conquest and/or exile. But not the Judahites. Their identity as a people did just the opposite - it persisted and actually became stronger. The Jews of exile undoubtedly began codifying their sacred texts into the Old Testament scriptures that we have today. Of course, God's providential care sustained them throughout the Babylonian captivity until they could return to the Promised Land. But practically, they had to take the steps that would allow them to maintain their corporate existence in the absence of a land or a Temple cult. The fact that they succeeded remains one of the great marvels of history.

Then there's the figure of Esther herself. Young, ethnically different from the people who surrounded her in the court of Xerxes, and faced with a powerful adversary in the court official Haman, Esther makes a compelling heroine. Early in the book, her chief assets seem to be her beauty and a very capable uncle in the person of Mordecai. But when crisis strikes and Haman's plots threaten the destruction of all the Jews in Persian lands, Esther risks her own life - first by seeking an audience with the king uninvited, and then by baldly exposing Haman's plot to the king.

Now, the Babylonian Empire is gone by the time of the events described in Esther, and the Persians have allowed the Jewish elite in exile to return to their land. But many Jews have stayed in Persia, and after all, Judah itself is now incorporated into the massive Persian Empire. If Haman's plots had been carried out, it mostly probably would have meant the extermination of the Jews as a distinct people. The actions of one young woman were thus crucial to the survival of God's chosen people.

We might ask the question, "Why did Esther act at all?" Mordecai issues his famous challenge ("Who knows? Perhaps you have come to the throne for just such a time as this.") and simultaneously threatens Esther that she will not escape Haman's wrath just because she is the queen. But that must have seemed like a desperate threat from a man who - because he was one of Haman's chief enemies - must have been at the top of the proscription list.

Nevertheless, Esther acts. Faced with a choice, she chooses to risk her own life and position in what must have seemed like a desperate gamble. And that choice proved salvific for God's people. I look at this story in my current article in the Covenant Discipleship Quarterly. I believe there are a number of reasons why Esther found the courage to do what she did. Foremost among these is the way she was nurtured and formed by the practices of a close-knit religious community. Esther could act because of who she was raised to be. If she did not know how to pray, or how to fast, or how to identify with her faith, Mordecai's appeals to her would undoubtedly have fallen on deaf ears.

Is there a lesson in this for us? Sure there is. Formation in the faith is key to our identity as Christians. People are almost never sanctified in an instant. It is a long, slow process that extends over one's entire life. But when we are shaped in faithful ways, we can be assured that, when He comes to us, we will recognize Him for Who He Is.

Labels: ,

So Judas is a bad guy, after all

Sunday, December 02, 2007


Sometime ago, National Geographic came out with a sensationalistic story arguing that the Gospel of Judas, a Gnostic text dating from the 3rd century A.D., reveals that Judas wasn't actually a dirty, rotten betrayer of Jesus. As the "Lost Gospel of Judas" website says, "this newly discovered Gospel portrays Judas as acting at Jesus' request when he hands Jesus over to the authorities."

Like most sensationalistic, media-driven stories about new Jesus "discoveries", this one is turning out to be way over-blown. In an interesting NY Times op/ed piece, Rice University biblical scholar April D. DeConick explains several serious translation errors on the part of the National Geographic team that led to significant misinterpretations of the text - some of them the exact opposite of what the gospel actually means. (Read Prof. DeConick's article here.) For instance, the gospel, while Gnostic in flavor and not friendly to an orthodox Catholic cosmology, nevertheless calls Judas a demon who is separated from the holy generation of Jesus' followers and who is informed of the mysteries of the kingdom only so he can endure suffering appropriate to his crime. All of this, properly revealed by Prof. DeConick's translation, runs counter to the version National Geographic put forward.

I haven't read the National Geographic issue on the Gospel of Judas, nor have I read the gospel itself. I've just got too many other things on my list. But I do appreciate it when a responsible scholar speaks up to correct the hasty mistakes of a media source desperate to make a buck off of sensationalistic reporting.

Labels: ,

Favorite Bible Translation?

Wednesday, October 03, 2007


For the past few years, I've been using Ellsworth Kalas' The Grand Sweep: 365 Days From Genesis Through Revelation as a guide to reading through the Scriptures in a year. I'm about to finish my third year of this practice, and so far I have used the NRSV, the NIV, and the RSV for my yearly treks.

It is helpful to see how actual translations are different. But to me, the truly fascinating differences are those between various study editions in their footnotes and introductory articles. (For a good example, just go compare the HarperCollins NRSV Study Bible and the Zondervan NIV Study Bible. It's remarkable.)

I want to use a new translation in the coming year, but I've run out of the ones with which I am familiar. I grew up with the RSV, used the NRSV in divinity school, and turned to the NIV during my first appointment in ministry. The only other version I've even heard read very much is the KJV.

My question: What version do you prefer in your own study and devotion? One of the ones already mentioned? Another one? And why?

I am leaning a little bit toward the New Jerusalem Bible right now, mostly because it is an accepted Roman Catholic translation and I've never read one of those. But I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise!

Labels: ,

Practicing your faith

Wednesday, May 09, 2007


I don't believe in a John 3:16 faith.

That is, I don't believe that the Christian faith is summed up perfectly in that particular verse, as so many people do. Now I do think every bit of it is true: God does love the world; he did give his only begotten son; we are called to believe in him and we are promised eternal life.

But the problem with a John 3:16 faith is that so many people both start and stop with it. The transformation of their lives (what we call sanctification) is not important, so long as they believe that Jesus is who he says he is. How they use their time, who they choose to love, how they spend their money, and whether they commit to life in the church don't seem to have much bearing in their lives.

The problem with this, of course, is that it runs against the grain of the entire New Testament witness. The Scriptures want to testify to us how our lives are transformed by Christ as we live in the covenant community known as the church. And that involves a change in our habits. Every one of them.

There are other "3:16s" out there that help to put John 3:16 in its proper perspective. Check out Ephesians 3:16, which speaks of inner transformation through the power of the Spirit (a transformation which, if it is true, must be expressed outwardly as well). Or Philippians 3:16, which enjoins us to hold fast to what we have attained - a statement which, in the light of Paul's previous comments about pressing on toward the goal, is about the importance of how we live out our lives in concrete acts. Then, of course, there is Revelation 3:16, where the Laodiceans are told that they will be spewed out of Christ's mouth for their lukewarmness. If that's not a call to a new way of life, I don't know what is!

About a year and a half ago, Steve Manskar at the General Board of Discipleship asked me to write a couple of short essays for Covenant Discipleship Quarterly about my experience with Covenant Discipleship Groups. I happen to think CD Groups are one of the best tools in helping Christians practice their faith through concrete acts - acts which, in turn, help to facilitate the work of the Spirit in sanctification. So if you are interested in something more than a simple John 3:16 faith, you should check out Steve's work in Covenant Discipleship at the GBOD. The website is here.

Those two essays I wrote for the CDQ are online as well:

Covenant Discipleship and My Journey into Ministry (Part I)

Covenant Discipleship and My Journey into Ministry (Part II)

Steve recently asked me to start contributing regularly to CDQ, so there will be more essays out in the future. I'll post them on the blog as I do with my United Methodist Reporter columns.

Labels: , , ,