Annual Conference Reflections

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

I have been in Rogers, Arkansas, since Sunday night at the Arkansas Annual Conference. Since moving to Durham, NC, I have always looked forward to returning home each summer to reunite with colleagues and friends in ministry. This year has been especially nice, since I had several friends who were either ordained or commissioned into ministry.

Since Annual Conference ends today, I wanted to offer some thoughts on what I thought were real highlights from the past three days. These are basically in reverse order starting with this morning and working backward.

- We completed voting on the constitutional amendments today, which I thought went mostly pretty well. The Rev. Rodney Steele, our lead clergy delegate to General Conference, explained the amendments to the annual conference. There were some real contentious issues, and I thought delegates tried hard to be respectful and courteous in their remarks. My sense from the floor discussion and the conversations in the halls makes me think that both the Worldwide Church amendments and Amendment 1 (on church membership) are going to fail.

The confused discussion on the Worldwide Church amendments proved to me that their defeat is a good thing. No one was clear on what the amendments, once adopted, would lead to in terms of church structure. And the possibility that we could see increased bureaucracy through a new layer of conferencing was distasteful to people from all over the spectrum. We need to reconcile the differences between the way the American church is treated in the Book of Discipline with the way the church in the rest of the world is treated, but this proposal is not the way to go. These amendments will most probably fail. And when they do, I hope the church as a whole is able to go about the discernment over our ecclesiastical structure in a more coherent way (and frankly, using a proposal that seeks to streamline our hierarchical structure and reduce the complexity of our bureaucracy rather than do the opposite).

On Amendment 1, we really had two debates. One was the debate that centered specifically on the issue of homosexuality (which I argued was not the way we should think about the amendment). The other was the issue of pastoral authority as the shepherd of the (local congregational) flock. The amendment, poorly worded and poorly conceived, will almost certainly fail.

[UPDATE: The Arkansas Conference voting results have been posted on the conference website, which you can find here. Thanks to Matthew Johnson for pointing this out.]

- This morning the Rev. Ronnie Miller-Yow preached the morning service, and the annual conference session was electrified. Ronnie was ordained just last night, and his message to the conference was a real highlight of the week. He spoke of what it means to be a transformative church, challenging the conference to welcome Jesus into their churches, to preach the good news, to do works of ministry in Jesus' name, and to be willing to think creatively in how we reach the suffering and the lost.

- Last night's Ordination Service was (as it always is) an occasion for celebration and hope. We commissioned or ordained 33 elders and deacons. And I have no doubt that they will go forth to do great ministry in Jesus' name.

- The Rev. Will Choate, who is planting Argenta UMC in North Little Rock, gave an address yesterday that touched on the importance of changing the way we think in how we are reaching people and going about our mission & evangelism. Will is one of the outstanding young adult clergy in the annual conference, and he provided a crucially important generational perspective to the delegates (and one that appeared to be much appreciated by young and old alike).

- On Monday evening, we had our annual gathering of Gen-X and Millennial clergy & lay delegates at the Mad Pizza Co. About 50 people came for food and conversation, and all had a great time. The Rev. Eric Van Meter began organizing this event 5 years ago, and it has grown from just a handful to a whole crowd. I would highly recommend this type of event for every annual conference. It helps to remind the young adult leaders in the conference that there are a lot of us out there and that we can support one another through reaching out and forming relationships.

- UMR Communications has been here this week, which is the parent company of the United Methodist Reporter where my bi-weekly column appears. I had the opportunity to visit with my friend Amy Forbus, the Digital Community Builder at UMR, and I got to meet the Rev. Andy James, who heads up Digital Print Sales. Sarah Wilke, the CEO, was also here and it was enjoyable to visit with her. Sarah has recently been named as the new world editor and publisher at the Upper Room, and she will no doubt bring the same high level leadership to the Upper Room that she has to UMR over the past several years.

- Dr. Jim Heidinger was the keynote speaker at the annual Confessing Movement breakfast, which took place on Monday morning. Jim is retiring this summer from his leadership of Good News, and he gave an optimistic and encouraging address on his view of the future of the UMC. Jim heads an organization that often gets unfairly pigeonholed by some, and I can tell you - from both his address and a personal conversation I was able to have with him afterward - that he is a warm and gentle pastor with a deep love for the church and a strong desire to see us embody our Wesleyan heritage in spreading the gospel and forming disciples for Jesus Christ.

It'll be tough not to see most of the folks here for another year, but the days of reunion are always a high point of my year. We can all (me included) tend toward cynicism when it comes to thinking about the way the UMC is structured. But annual conference is still very much a means of grace, and it needs to be named as such. I am grateful for the fellowship it represents, and I think it often serves as a powerful arena for equipping the saints for ministry and celebrating the victory we have in Christ Jesus.

Labels: , ,

9 Comments:

Anonymous Tom P said...

Andrew,

Glad to hear that your AC went well. It is interesting to me to hear about the debate on the consitutional amendments in your conference. Our debate in Western PA seemed, on the whole, to cover the same ground as yours. I think that's good indication to me that, indeed, both amendment 1 and the amendments on the worldwide nature of the church will fail. However, the discussion is now open and I expect both issues to come up again in 2012.

12:15 PM  
Blogger Joe DeWitte said...

Andrew,

I must agree with you in your work on the Constitutional Amendments. I believe they came from a concern for the structure of the UMC as a global church, but they are, quite frankly, too sparse as to how these changes will look on the ground. To vote these in would be giving a blank check to any interpretation conceived. They were poorly and hastily written and passed (as we know regarding the questions of their passing at General Conference without all delegates present). Whether these are a political construction for a certain group's agenda or no, they are at bottom, not well written and therefore should not be part of our constitution.

The same argument must be said for Amendment 1. While the issue and agenda's surrounding homosexuality may play a part, I believe this is pale in the issue of pastoral authority over the local church. A conference that meets once every 4 years, and a human book (the BOD) cannot be the impetus for determining readiness for membership. We are called to make disciples and there is, at some point in the journey of discipleship, the question of church membership. However, to allow the individual, new to the faith and possibly ignorant of the complexity that is the Christian life, is not reasonable. The community, led by the pastor, grows such individuals into the communal Christian life, and then assists them in determining whether or not they should choose membership.

I am encouraged to hear of the great things happening at Annual Conferences all across the connection. I can feel the sense of Wesleyan 'reform' seething as the people meet, discuss, and discern the call of God.

12:44 PM  
Anonymous Matthew Johnson said...

The results are up on the arumc.org website. Amendment one failed 35%-65% and most of the worldwide church amendments failed nearly 4-1. Giving local pastors the right to vote for GC delegates passed with about an 85% majority in the Arkansas Annual Conference.

Travel safely, Andrew.

3:43 PM  
Blogger Jonathan said...

Dr. Jim Heidinger is an interesting fellow. I wish he were as Christological in his politics as he is in other areas. Did you get a chance to mention the Christocentrism of John Howard Yoder to him?

5:18 PM  
Anonymous McKennon Shea said...

Andrew-

Thanks for this post. It was a great summary, and most importantly, remained positive rather than cynical. Unfortunately, too many of our pastors and laity alike approach conferencing with a negativity and cynicism that is ultimately counterproductive to God's work through our church structures. I'm not advocating for a blind faith optimism, but as long as we remain hopeful and interested, our church will find itself on a good track toward's God's good future.

Go Hogs!

-McKennon

8:44 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Interesting results from Arkansas. All the amendments passed in Central PA.

12:13 PM  
Anonymous Matthew Johnson said...

Andrew addressed the big thing in our Conference, Chris - the entire discussion on the worldwide church amendments are filled with nothing but "no one knows" answers. To stand before 1000 people and have to repeatedly say that is a frustrating and vulnerable place to be and Rodney did a great job. I watched a lot of the 2008 General Conference online but not the parts where these amendments were passed. They sounded thrown together and hastily thought out. I think in 2012, when Bishop Jones and his task force brings all the information to the table we'll be better positioned to make these changes again.

3:39 PM  
Blogger Evan Jones said...

Andrew, you always do such a good job of providing a balanced view of things, would love to hear how you think Good News and The Confessing Movement are being pigeonholed.

12:59 PM  
Blogger Andrew C. Thompson said...

Hello all -

Thanks for the comments here. Here are some responses:

Matthew - Thanks for letting me know about the voting results. I've inserted a link into the original post.

Jonathan - No, we didn't get a chance to talk Yoder. But I do know Dr. Heidinger reads my Reporter columns at times, so I assume he knows of my affinity for Yoder's ecclesiological sense and fidelity to Jesus' teachings on peacemaking. He and I have engaged in e-mail conversations about my commentary on the Worldwide Church amendments, which focus on the issue of nationalism. That was a very constructive conversation.

Evan - My post actually only referred to the pigeonholing of Good News (GM), although I am not opposed to putting the Confessing Movement (CM) into the same category.

I think the pigeonholing happens on different levels, from published work to everyday conversation. For instance, Leon Howell's 2003 book, "United Methodism @ Risk: A Wake-Up Call," characterizes GN, the CM, and other renewal organizations as dangerous to the UMC. [Disclaimer: I hold a John Wesley Fellowship from AFTE as a part of my doctoral program, and AFTE is one of the organizations that made the list in Howell's book. But I have never given money to either GN or the CM, nor have I ever subscribed to any of their publications as of this posting.] But if you read a lot of their descriptions, the thing that stands out is how uncontroversial most of their goals are. They simply want the church to hold to beliefs that have been a part of historic Christianity since the early church. And by that, I mean the doctrine of the Trinity, the classical doctrines associated with the person and work of Jesus Christ, etc.

On a popular level, I often hear comments about how GN and the CM care only about issues of sexuality. While both organizations clearly believe that the church's current stance on homosexuality is the right one, I don't think it is fair to see either through such a one-dimensional lens. For instance, in Dr. Heidinger's speech last Monday, I heard one passing reference to sexuality in an address that probably lasted 45 mins. And feature articles in the current issue of Good News Magazine (which I picked up at the breakfast) include topics such as the spread of global Christianity, the new Wesley Study Bible, ministry with women in the local church, and John Wesley & the doctrine of predestination. Aside from one paragraph in the article on global Christianity that mentions attitudes toward homosexuality in the African church, I didn't see another reference about homosexuality in any of those features.

That's a bit of a longer answer than I intended to give. But let me say a thing or two more. To be fair, I see and hear caricaturing when it comes to "liberal" groups and stances as well, particularly around issues like the death penalty, peacemaking/pacifism, issues related to race, and the church's outreach to the poor, drug addicted, etc. Not all self-described conservatives are insensitive to these issues, just as not all self-described liberals are insensitive to issues that people of a conservative bent tend to focus upon. Particularly when it comes to reaching out to the poor, the drug-addicted, AIDS sufferers, etc., it seems as if liberals and conservatives are often of one heart and mind.

I included the original comment in my post partly because of the way I was confronted by my own smug condescension when I was appointed by my bishop to serve a local church in Arkansas that had lots of people active in the Confessing Movement (including more than one who sat on the state board). Frankly, these were some of the most Jesus-loving, committed disciples I've ever come across. They were as serious about walking the way of salvation as anybody I had ever encountered. And seeing that, a lot of my own tendency to stereotype began to fall away.

Peace,
Andrew

9:57 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home