Obama: Gen X or not?

Wednesday, August 27, 2008


In some ways, it's an interesting question. Obama was born in 1961, which by most calculations is at the tail end of the Baby Boom generation.

Susan Ferrechio wrote an article in the Washington D.C. Examiner presenting the point of view that Obama is, indeed, the first Generation X presidential candidate. I actually have a neat connection to this article - I was interviewed for it! And while I'm not 100% sold on the idea that Obama is an X'er, I do find some of Ferrechio's points to be persuasive.

In my own writing on the parameters and characteristics of Generation X (which you can read here, for example), I have suggested that Gen-X really starts at about 1965 and goes until 1982. That allows its beginning to match up with the end of the baby boom (which is, in some sense, a measurable demographic characteristic). But Generation X itself is really more of a cultural concept than a statistical category, so any parameters of its beginning and ending are going to be inexact (Ferrechio, for instance, defines Gen-X as those born between 1961 and 1981, which allows her to include Obama in it).

One way of thinking about Obama's place in Generation X it is to look at his two chief rivals for the presidency - Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, and now John McCain in the general election. In some ways, those two are quintessential Baby Boomers from the political left and political right. Clinton swung left after her mid-1960s flirtation with Barry Goldwater; together with husband Bill, she epitomizes the New Democrat of the Baby Boom generation, who consolidated the political and cultural gains of the 1960s and 70s and then moved to the center (particularly on economics) as a strategy to get elected.

McCain, on the other hand, was one of the young men who marched off to Vietnam and had his life determinatively shaped in the process. Regardless of his reputation as a maverick (and his advocacy for such non-conservative policies as campaign finance reform), McCain is more or less a Baby Boomer Republican whose career was largely influenced by Reagan conservatism (i.e., free market economics and a hawkish foreign policy).

As I point out in an earlier blog post, Obama has the distinction of growing up too late to be affected by Vietnam in his formative years. And he was too young for his personality to be forged in the crucible of the Civil Rights struggle as well. His rhetoric is heavy on the language of 'change', even if it's not always clear what he means by that. And he places emphasis on wanting to get past the very partisan divisiveness that the Boomer left and right have been embroiled in for the past several years. So in many ways, Obama's candidacy signals a cultural shift, even if he belongs chronologically to the last few years of the Baby Boomer generation.

A lot of this is just a matter of interpretation. As with all cultural notions, there aren't really any statistics to employ. I'll admit that, if Obama wins in November, his very presidency will undoubtedly have a big impact on how Generation X is defined. At any rate, it's good food for thought during while the Democratic National Convention is going on.

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger JenX67 said...

What a great post. I really like this line: "But Generation X itself is really more of a cultural concept than a statistical category.."

How cool that you got interviewed. I have noticed that the Church is more in tune with the impact this generation is having than government.

I think two things (among a sea)that have impacted our generation is 1) Growing up with the draft and 2) Growing up in schools that were not segregated.

9:10 AM  
Blogger JenX67 said...

One more thing - I also wonder about the impact of Christian music on Generation X. We came of age with Amy Grant and witnessed Debby Boone crossing over from pop to Christian. And, I wonder if it is OK to say that Generation X buoyed the Christian music industry because I just don't know many Baby Boomers who have even heard of Rich Mullins, etc.

9:15 AM  
Blogger Real Live Preacher said...

I was also born in 1961. The idea that we can all be crammed into boomer or x is a flawed one. This from one of the betweeners.

My family has always been between the wars. I was too old for Desert Storm and too young for viet nam. My dad was too old for viet nam and too young for WWII. My grandfater was too old for WWII and too young for WWI.

I never knew the Beatles when they were together. And yet I've never tasted Surge or an energy drink. ;-) I watched 30 Something in my 20s, and friends in my 30s. The Wonder Years was the closest thing to my life that I've ever seen.

6:10 PM  
Anonymous BearRichard said...

Well from what I gathered, those born between 1961-1964 would be considered either "cusp'ers" or "betweeners"(with 1965 and later being full fledge Gen'X), as those born in 1960 or earlier are full fledge Boomers, like me, I am born 1960 making me likely one of the last of them, my dad just fell a little short for WWII but was of age for Korea then.

I'm in the so called second half, the Generation Jones portion, where I was one of those later Boomers that grew up in the 70's, and that the other(first) half(those that are now past age 55) of that generation were the ones that grew up in the 60's and were of age for both Vietnam and Woodstock, as well as the Civil Rights movement.

According to the William Strauss' "Generations" book, as well as the Postwar Era, some wartime years were also included as Boomers starting with 1943, going through 1960 as designated Boomer years, and that the Thirteenth Generation(dubbed as Generation X) starts with 1961, going through 1981, according to that book.

4:55 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home