Language matters: social holiness
Sunday, August 17, 2008
In my new column in the Reporter, I focus approaching the Wesleyan meaning of 'social holiness' with reference to our use of language. My sense is that 'social holiness' is usually used in the church to describe the kind of outreach ministries that involve extending Christian love and aid to the poor and disadvantaged. Less often, the term is used to describe social justice efforts that involve changing unjust systems (whether of a legal or a societal/cultural nature).
I am a big supporter of both outreach ministries and social justice efforts, but the point I made in a recent blog post is that, when we use 'social justice' to describe such ministries, we are mis-using the term. Wesley's use of social holiness was in the context of how God sanctifies us; it was his firm belief that sanctification happens in the context of Christian community.
The reason it is important to attend to the language of our tradition is exactly because our Wesleyan understanding of salvation is wrapped up in it. As I write in my column, Practicing discipline in the use of our historical language is important. It could even help the church fulfill its stated mission - to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. Because in a Wesleyan sense we have to realize that we won't do any good transforming the world until we ourselves have been transformed from within ... That can happen to each of us through God's grace, and it always happens in community."
Here is Wesley on social holiness:
In the Preface to Hymns and Sacred Poems published by the Wesley brothers in 1739, Wesley criticizes writers among the "Mystic Divines" who recommend "an entire seclusion from men, (perhaps for months or years,) in order to purify the soul." He goes on, "For the religion these authors would edify us in, is solitary religion."
Wesley emphatically rejects this version of sanctification, writing, "Directly opposite to this is the gospel of Christ. Solitary religion is not to be found there. 'Holy solitaries' is a phrase no more consistent with the gospel than holy adulterers. The gospel of Christ knows of no religion, but social; no holiness but social holiness."
Wesley's understanding of social holiness is further fleshed out in the 1748 sermon, "Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount (IV)," where he writes, "When I say [Christianity] is essentially a social religion, I mean not only that it cannot subsist so well, but that it cannot subsist at all without society, without living and conversing with other men."
I think what he has in mind here is the kind of prudential means of grace represented in the Methodist society and its attendant sub-structures - the band, class meeting, etc. They are the place where 'iron sharpens iron' (Proverbs 27:17) and where shared testimony, mutual accountability, confession, and exhortation help to nurture holiness of heart and life in Christian believers. That, as I understand it, is the nature of social holiness.
I am a big supporter of both outreach ministries and social justice efforts, but the point I made in a recent blog post is that, when we use 'social justice' to describe such ministries, we are mis-using the term. Wesley's use of social holiness was in the context of how God sanctifies us; it was his firm belief that sanctification happens in the context of Christian community.
The reason it is important to attend to the language of our tradition is exactly because our Wesleyan understanding of salvation is wrapped up in it. As I write in my column, Practicing discipline in the use of our historical language is important. It could even help the church fulfill its stated mission - to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. Because in a Wesleyan sense we have to realize that we won't do any good transforming the world until we ourselves have been transformed from within ... That can happen to each of us through God's grace, and it always happens in community."
Here is Wesley on social holiness:
In the Preface to Hymns and Sacred Poems published by the Wesley brothers in 1739, Wesley criticizes writers among the "Mystic Divines" who recommend "an entire seclusion from men, (perhaps for months or years,) in order to purify the soul." He goes on, "For the religion these authors would edify us in, is solitary religion."
Wesley emphatically rejects this version of sanctification, writing, "Directly opposite to this is the gospel of Christ. Solitary religion is not to be found there. 'Holy solitaries' is a phrase no more consistent with the gospel than holy adulterers. The gospel of Christ knows of no religion, but social; no holiness but social holiness."
Wesley's understanding of social holiness is further fleshed out in the 1748 sermon, "Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount (IV)," where he writes, "When I say [Christianity] is essentially a social religion, I mean not only that it cannot subsist so well, but that it cannot subsist at all without society, without living and conversing with other men."
I think what he has in mind here is the kind of prudential means of grace represented in the Methodist society and its attendant sub-structures - the band, class meeting, etc. They are the place where 'iron sharpens iron' (Proverbs 27:17) and where shared testimony, mutual accountability, confession, and exhortation help to nurture holiness of heart and life in Christian believers. That, as I understand it, is the nature of social holiness.

9 Comments:
Hello - I am a fellow GenXer - raised in the holiness tradition. I am working on a project for my blog - listing 50 GenX bloggers from 50 States. I have added you to my list to represent that State of North Carolina. I am looking for a diverse group of Gen Xers in an effort to raise awareness about all things great and good about GenX. I hope you will stop by my blog often and see other GenXers on the blogroll. You are the first man I've selected. Can you let me know what year you were born so I can include it? Also, do you think GenX changed worship? It has changed dramatically in the Church of the Nazarene during my life time. Also, you were a easy pic. I grew up in a parsonage. Thanks, jenX67
Jen -
Thanks! I checked out your blog and you've got a great site. I was born in 1976. I do think there are some distinctive Generation X trends in worship and church life generally, which you can see in things as diverse as the New Monasticism and the Emergent movement.
I also write a bi-weekly column for the United Methodist Reporter (www.umportal.org), which focuses on issues of faith, church, and community related to Generation X. Shoot me an e-mail and I'll send you links to a couple of articles that you might be particularly interested in. My address is andrew@mandatum.org.
Also, if you are interested in another Gen X pastor's blog, you might check out Guy Williams, who is listed in the favorites section of my sidebar. His blog's title is Gen-X Missional Wesleyan, and he's in Texas.
Pax,
Andrew Thompson
Thank you! Yes, I'd love to have the links to the articles. I have seen the "Emergent Nazarenes" on blogs and didn't know what they were or what that meant. Interesting. Thanks for the info about Guy's blog. I'll check him out.
I just found your blog via the Jenx67 site...interesting and look forward to reading more. We attend a small United Methodist congregation up here in Alaska.
Stephanie
Stephanie -
Thanks! I think you'll be my first Alaska reader!
- AT
I nearly started to cry when I got to the point in your article - we can't take the communion on line. It is true, we seek connections, control and even anonymity online. Online, we present the perfect version of ourselves, which is exactly what I try to resist in my blog - and why I rarely write about my children anymore. My posts were superficial and did not capture genuninely the struggles. Nor did writing about the challenges do justice to the joy. For me, there is no clothesline where I gather with women to talk and share. I'm lucky I have a front porch and it does make a difference as our neighbors do gather together some evenings to talk and share. But, even that is rare. I appreciate your writing and hope your footprint will be increased by whatever few readers will find your site through mine. I'll continue to read more as I have time.
One of the great disappointments I've experienced in serving socially active and justice directed churches it the feeling of superiority that sometimes rears its head among those who enable these ministries.
I wanted to take a moment and thank you for your essay in the UM
Reporter, "GEN-X RISING: Our language matters".
I think you hit a home run with this one. I fear that your analysis of Wesley's language is so contrary to the modern usage and thought that some will not even be able to grasp the import of what you have said. I pray I am wrong.
It certainly needed to be said by someone of your stature and qualifications.
Robert,
Thanks for that feedback. I've gotten more feedback on that column than any I've written in quite some time. It seems to have really struck a chord with a lot of people.
Peace,
Andrew.
Post a Comment
<< Home