A new appointment

Tuesday, July 01, 2008


At church on Sunday, our pastor mentioned that it was Moving Day for pastors in the North Carolina Annual Conference. This is the season for "Moving Days" across the UM connection, and that means it is the season of appointment process uncertainties and the unique reality of being a Methodist preacher. "We work on one-year contracts," you'll often hear Methodist preachers say. And it's true that you never know when that call from the district superintendent is going to come, telling you that it's time to pack up your belongings and move to a new town.

We all actually live in a more transient culture than pretty much any previous generation in American history. People move with a lot more frequency than they used to, whether for work, school, or some other reason. So it's a little curious in some ways that Methodist clergy seem more wary than ever of the appointment system. They look at their fellow clergy in other denominations who can potentially have 20 or 25 year pastorates, and the prospect of moving every 4 or 5 years can seem downright unappealing. But then again, who lives in the same place for 20 or 25 years anymore?

This may be an unpopular stance to take, but I'm willing to speak up for the appointment system. In fact, I think it can teach us something about the nature of ministry that a "call system" cannot. In my Lent column last year, I wrote about the virtue of someone else telling you a Lenten discipline to take on, rather than choosing one yourself. The virtue in question is humility, and it is fundamental to learning the kind of love that Jesus wants to teach us. In a way, I think the appointment system in the UMC, which goes back to John Wesley himself, teaches pastors a similar humility. Accepting the appointive authority of the bishop is akin to saying, "Ok God, I accept that I may not know best how to serve the church. So I will accept the guidance of the Holy Spirit and my bishop in telling me where you need me most."

I don't claim that the appointment system is flawless. Mistakes happen every year, in every annual conference. But in the midst of our grumbling, we should realize that there's a whole lot that does work about it. And we Methodist pastors have the opportunity to learn something about servant leadership - through the very way we accept pastoral appointments - in a way that our fellow clergy in other denominations do not.

Along those same lines, I've also got some news to share. Emily and I were contacted a few weeks ago by Gray Southern, district superintendent of the Durham District in this annual conference. He asked if I would be willing to take an appointment in Henderson, NC, at Mt. Carmel United Methodist Church. It's a beautiful little country church that dates back to the 1850s, and Emily and I are excited about starting there in a few weeks (that's a picture of it in the photo at the top of the post). I'm committed to working at the Duke Youth Academy for Christian Formation in July, so our first Sunday at Mt. Carmel will be August 3rd.

I've experienced unexpected calls related to the appointment process before, and this was quite similar. I wasn't seeking out an appointment, and even though it is technically only quarter-time, it is going to take some time away that I could be spending on my doctoral program. But through prayer and conversation, Emily and I came to the conclusion that this is just one more example of the Holy Spirit working in our lives. The church is telling us where it needs us to serve. And I think the proper response is humble obedience to the call of the Spirit and the church.

Besides, now I'll be preaching again every week! Woo-hoo!

6 Comments:

OpenID guymwilliams.net said...

Congrats on the appointment. A retired preacher I know was asked recently how it felt not to be preaching weekly anymore, to which he responded that he felt like a cow that hadn't been milked! Glad to hear you'll get to preach weekly.

1:01 AM  
Blogger Rev. J said...

Congrats on the new appointment, may God bless your ministry.

7:10 AM  
Blogger Daniel McLain Hixon said...

Hey Andrew,
I hope you have a great new year.
I wanted to second what you said about the value of the 'sent' system. Though I am sometimes critical of the itenerancy and how it actually plays out - it was one of the initial attractions for me to the United Methodist ministry.

Roman Catholics typically have to give themselves to a discipline of total life-long celibacy to serve as pastors, so you know there is some serious commitment there.
Monks in monasteries take vows of poverty, chastity (usually celibacy), and obedience (and in some cases, stability!).

That there should be come corporate discipline for the order of elders - a vow of obedience as it were (perhaps a vow of "obedient mobility"?) and of course the vow of chastity in accord with para. 326.a.6 - seems very appropriate and in-keeping with the ancient Christian traditions.

I also think it is interesting that almost all corners of the Church are (rightly, I think) calling for longer (5+ year) appointments even as our society continues to be as mobile as you point out. Maybe there is something counter-cultural going on or what, I don't know...

6:49 PM  
Blogger Daniel McLain Hixon said...

please disregard my exceptionally poor spelling today :)

6:54 PM  
Blogger Joe DeWitte said...

Andrew,

My wife and I live in the Henderson area. She serves a church here and I commute to Fuquay (though I served for 3 years in Henderson myself). We're at Duke Div. for the M.Div. I just want to make myself available if you would like the grand tour of Henderson or anything else you'd like to know. God Bless!

Joe DeWitte

2:51 PM  
Blogger Andrew C. Thompson said...

Thanks for all those well-wishes.

Daniel, I share your desire for a greater sense of corporate discipline for our clergy orders. Though I know there is a push to make the Order of Deacons and Order of Elders into more covenant bodies in some annual conferences (including my own), I doubt that it will really amount to much over the long term. The problem is that clergy at the annual conference level are used to relating to one another in certain ways, and to try to nurture something that new to them (although old to Methodism) would be a stretch.

I would like to see a voluntary clergy order develop that would provide a form of covenant discipline for its members. In the past, I have spoken to others about an Ordo Missionis Wesleyani, an Order of the Wesleyan Mission, that would commit itself to faithful preaching of Wesley's three grand doctrines (Original Sin, Justification by Faith, and the Holiness consequent thereupon) as well as holy living. I think there are enough pastors of around our age that it is feasible.

Joe, thanks for letting me know where you and your wife are located. We should get together for coffee or lunch in the coming weeks. I don't start at the church until August 3rd, so I won't be making the drive until then. I'll try to track you down in the halls at the Div School once classes come back into session.

9:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home