"I'm spiritual, but not religious"
Friday, July 27, 2007

You hear versions of this statement all the time, and I write about it in my current UM Reporter column. Some other related comments: "I do my Sunday morning worship on the golf course," or "I can worship just as well on the beach (or in the woods, or on the river, or in my living room), as I can in a church sanctuary." It all goes back to a sugary "spirituality" that is rampant in our culture. Literally yesterday, I heard a former United Methodist minister in an NPR interview who said, "I'm a very spiritual person, but for me that is an individual thing."
The only possible Christian response to such a ridiculous statements as those above is "No, you cannot worship God just as well by yourself. And there is no such thing as an individual spirituality." Because since we are the body of Christ, and individually members of it, we are called to actually, physically gather together as the church. A Eucharist of one is an ontological impossibility.
Listen to these words from Dietrich Bonhoeffer about church as a gathered community:
"Through fellowship and communion with the incarnate Lord, we recover our true humanity, and at the same time we are delivered from that individualism which is the consequence of sin, and retrieve our solidarity with the whole human race." (The Cost of Discipleship, p. 302).
So seen one way, the thing that causes people to define their "spirituality" in individual terms is simply a consequence of sin. It is pride, because it is a way of saying, "I can define my relationship with God, and no one else." It is also a form of laziness, in that people who espouse it want to have God on their terms and do not want anyone else telling them that their notion of God might be mistaken or misguided.
So we should be clear: it is the church that tells us who God is. The church is the community of faith which, across time, has maintained a constant witness to the God of the Old and New Testaments. The church makes that God intelligible to us, which would simply not be possible on our own. And the church is the community that Christ himself has determined his followers will find their lives until the final consummation.
Lots of Gen X'er Chrisitan I talk to are interested in the true renewal of the church. They want to see a church, alive and faithful, making a powerful witness in the world. They want to see Christians in that church who engage their faith on a deep level. I hear those Gen X'ers in face-to-face conversations, via e-mail, and in the blogosphere.
But if we Gen X'ers really want to help bring about the renewal of the church, we have to recognize the dangerous, mistaken notions of discipleship that are out there in our culture. There can be no renewal of the church without a deep understanding of how much discipleship to Jesus is at odds with life in the world. And that discipleship calls us to recognize that the church is a community where "I" makes no sense without "us."

6 Comments:
"A Eucharist of one is an ontological impossibility."
Excellent. I wonder to what degree a diminished place of the Eucharist has contributed to the individualized spirituality of modern Christians in the West. At the same time, I wonder to what degree individualized spirituality has affected the meaning of the Eucharist in popular understanding. I think it is as much about a private encounter with God as any other practice co-opted for individualized spiritual use.
Your post reminds me of an episode of King of the Hill in which Hank goes looking for a new church. One character says: "Me, I don't go to church, church goes with me. I'm worshiping when I'm drinking a beer, digging a hole, or fishing for trout."
Hank replies "I happen to know that's assinine."
For at least a couple decades now I've heard a large number of Christians downplaying "religion" in favor of "relationship with Christ". I wonder to what extent this do-it-yourself spirituality is the result of that type of thinking, taken to its logical conclusion.
i dunno. i've been wrestling with this for a while. for the past several years, fellowship with one or two other christians (which would have been on the golf course if i were a golfer - i'm not) has been "church" for me.
“So seen one way, the thing that causes people to define their "spirituality" in individual terms is simply a consequence of sin. It is pride, because it is a way of saying, "I can define my relationship with God, and no one else." It is also a form of laziness, in that people who espouse it want to have God on their terms and do not want anyone else telling them that their notion of God might be mistaken or misguided.”
It is a form of laziness to accept someone else’s notion of God – especially from the religiousness of the church. Here’s why…
Maybe people no longer find religion relevant because they confront in religion the definitions that the church has imposed upon the wonder of God. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that these definitions are no longer adequate – much less believable. Perhaps this faith crisis – (my definition of your spirituality vs. religion idea) - is with the narrow definitions of the church and not with the wonder that lies behind it.
The thing that I think we need to remember is that there's a tremendous difference between the experience of God and the way any human being at any time in history explains the experience; because no human explanation will ever be eternal. And what we've done as a church is to make idols out of our explanations.
Perhaps people are looking to spirituality because religion has so literalized the way they have described the God experience in the past that it is unbelievable in today’s world.
Could it be people are unable to connect with those old, time-warped literal explanations?
Why do we've never suggest that there's something beyond that?
The God experience can never be captured in words, it can only be pointed to.
Don’t the scriptures point to the reality of God instead to capturing the reality of God?
God is bigger and more wondrous than anyone will ever be able to embrace with any words, or creeds or ideas.
Isn’t the religious life a journey into the mystery of God and not so much what a church says about having the answers?
Could it be that what we have done as a church is to make idols out of our old, time-warped explanations?
A friend of mine just told me, "I'm an ethical Christian, not an ontological Christian." He believes in loving our neighbors as we love ourselves, but has humility concerning what we can know about God.
Post a Comment
<< Home